'Poli-Migra': New Spanish Word for Blurred Line Between Police and ICE
La Raza, News Report, Fabiola Pomareda, Posted: Sep 02, 2008
Traducción al español
Editor's Note: A new police tactic has caused alarm among Chicago’s immigrant community. The term “poli-migra” has emerged in the local Spanish lexicon to reflect ongoing police efforts that have blurred the lines between local, state and federal authority. Immigrants from Latin American countries detained by Chicago police officers for minor infractions are increasingly ending up in “immigration hold” status. Fabiola Pomareda reports for Chicago's La Raza newspaper.
CHICAGO -- After spending almost an entire year behind bars, Arturo Trujillo was finally a free man. In June 2007, Trujillo was arrested for battery, having been accused of participating in a brawl with three other men. The charges were eventually dropped at the beginning of May –- Trujillo had acted in self-defense –- but the Mexican immigrant would spend three more weeks in jail, waiting for immigration officials to sign his release pending a separate court date regarding his immigration status.
The same thing happened to Luis León, a Mexican immigrant released on bail last week after being arrested Feb. 14 for driving without a license.
Last May, members of the March 10 Movement, a Chicago immigrant rights group, along with pastor José Landaverde of Our Lady of Guadalupe and Cook County Commissioner Roberto Maldonado, accused officials from the Chicago Police Department (CPD), Sheriff's Office for Cook County and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) of dragging their feet on cases involving both documented and undocumented immigrants. Some were innocent. Others should have been freed on bond. But as the cases piled up, for the defendants, justice was less than swift.
Family members began looking for help. Their offers to post bail were rejected.
Both the city of Chicago and Cook County have sanctuary ordinances on the books that prevent arresting officers from asking detainees their immigration status during routine stops. Officers are also forbidden from reporting suspected illegal immigrants to federal authorities unless the detainees are official suspects in ongoing criminal investigations.
Serving time without a sentence
Landaverde and members of the March 10 Movement have documented 59 cases so far of Hispanic immigrants who have been placed on “immigration hold,” a shadowy status that begs the question: What is happening with their cases?
“If you are arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, the judge suspends your license, gives you a fine and releases you,” said Jorge Mújica, member of the March 10 Movement. “But in these cases, (someone) is saying to them, ‘You aren’t going anywhere because you’re on immigration hold.’ The problem here is that regardless of the charge being brought against them and regardless of a judge’s order, there is a second procedure that orders their detention due to their illegal status,” Mújica explained.
In June, Cook County Sheriff’s Office spokesperson Penny Mateck told La Raza, “The agency that arrests a person, in this (Trujillo) case the Chicago Police Department, is the agency that’s responsible for contacting ICE, which then initiates the immigration status proceedings against the detainee.”
After being cleared of charges or posting bail, a detainee is held until being transferred to the custody of ICE, often resulting in lengthy delays. According to the Cook County Sheriff’s Office, ICE has 48 hours to take custody of a detainee; otherwise the person should be released.
Mateck blamed the delay in releasing Trujillo on a “breakdown in communication” between the sheriff’s office and ICE. “We were using a broader interpretation of the 48-hour rule. But we’ve made changes and now we are using more conservative criteria,” the spokeswoman said.
But according to Cook County Commissioner Maldonado, “The Chicago Police Department is violating its own order that says they can't report anyone to ICE unless that person is involved in a criminal investigation. How are they going to report someone to ICE for a civil violation like driving through a red light?” Maldonado asked.
“The basic problem here lies with whoever it is that starts the ball rolling by reporting an undocumented person to ICE for an infraction that is not criminal,” the commissioner said.
Public hearing gets hot
Since the issue has come to light, officials have been scrambling to reassure residents that past missteps by police have been corrected. On Aug. 5, the Chicago City Council’s Human Relations Committee held a public meeting called by aldermen William Ocasio (D-26) and Daniel Solís (D-25), who have two of the city’s biggest Hispanic constituencies.
CPD patrol captain and first deputy superintendent Beatrice Cuello assured residents, “We don’t notify ICE, except when we are conducting a criminal investigation.”
Cuello also said police recently began working with the Mexican Consulate in Chicago to produce a video that will inform undocumented immigrants of their rights if stopped by police. Police brochures will also be translated to Spanish.
“We want our immigrant community to know that we are here to serve them and that Chicago is a safe refuge,” she said.
Alderman Solís wants a stronger commitment from police officers, and he is pushing for them to sign a contract stating that they understand the sanctuary ordinance and that there will be consequences for officers who violate it.
“Place of birth”
Nevertheless, CPD Internal Affairs chief Tina Skahill said, “Every officer asks detainees where they were born, because it’s a standard question to identify suspects. When a person was born in another country, that information is included in the police report because a person could be confused with a criminal with the same name, but born in a different place,” Skahill said.
Mújica disagrees. “Asking someone their place of birth only adds confusion. I have two nationalities. I wasn’t born here, but I am a U.S. citizen,” he said.
Maldonado, the county commissioner, also thinks the question is irrelevant. “I’m not a public safety officer, but as a public and private person, I have to wonder why it is important to ask (a person’s birthplace). In my opinion that question should only be asked when there is a criminal investigation,” he said.
“We have to draw the line somewhere,” he added.
Agents prowl courthouse
Responding to the polemic, ICE spokesperson Gail Montenegro sent La Raza a written statement saying that every day of the week three federal agents are assigned to the Cook County Courthouse. Their duties include “reviewing police reports of the previous day’s detentions.”
“We review the files of those subjects who appear before a bail bond judge. ICE reviews all the reports that indicate a detainee was born outside the U.S. to determine those individuals that are subject to deportation. This is done before the bail hearing and independent of their nationality,” Montenegro wrote.
ICE then determines if an immigration hold should be placed on detainees who are criminals, and priority is given to those convicted of serious crimes, those who have been deported previously, or those who have a pending deportation order, the statement explained.
Montenegro also said ICE does not have a policy of racial profiling. Rather, the agency has a Criminal Alien Program that “seeks to ensure that foreign criminals are processed for deportation after completing their sentences rather than be released to the street.”
In response to ICE’s statement, Maldonado complained of a “systematic pattern” followed by the agency that has allowed ICE officials to penetrate Cook County’s criminal justice system by placing agents in court rooms during bail hearings.
Cook County State's Attorney spokesman John Gorman told La Raza that police reports and case files are “public documents available in court rooms to public officials, whether for parole agents, police officers or immigration officials.”
“(ICE agents) are looking at public information that is available to personnel from law enforcement agencies. They’re not looking at our databases or computers,” Gorman said.
Unanswered questions
What happens next is unclear. The city council’s Human Relations Committee will issue a report as soon as they receive results from an internal inquiry from the police department, said Alderman Ocasio’s assistant, Héctor Villagrana. No one is sure when the CPD internal review will be completed.
In the meantime, the sheriff’s office sent a report to Commissioner Maldonado documenting the number of persons placed in immigration hold from April to August this year. Out of 253 cases, 229 are Hispanic, most of them of Mexican descent.
Translated by David Boddiger
Related Articles:
What About the Companies?
The Politics Driving Mississippi’s ICE Raid
Railroad Justice
Interpreting the Largest ICE Raid in U.S. History: A Personal Account
Page
1 of 1
|
|

User Comments
John Wayne - Texas on Sep 04, 2008 at 18:29:38 said:
Americans should be encouraged to execute CITIZENS ARREST of illegal mexicans!
This is the only way we can TAKE BACK our country from the mexican vermin!
Once Americans are given the authority to execute CITIZENS ARREST of illegal mexicans, organizations like the Minutemen can round them up...ALL of them!
And catapult them back over the border...to mee-hee-coo...where they belong!
AUDIOS!
dave on Sep 04, 2008 at 11:17:57 said:
I respect the right to free speech, but shouldn't there be some moderation of comments here? I feel that both john chivington and Robert H have crossed a line. Both of their comments are hurtful and untrue.
Robert H on Sep 03, 2008 at 17:40:07 said:
MEXICANS should be ARRESTED then sent to the border to clean up the environmental NIGHTMARE those dirty people created before deportation proceedings!
It's mind boggling the same people who wine about the environment protect these CRIMINALS!
I'm tired of "Criminal aliens"!
They ALL are!
Ali on Sep 03, 2008 at 13:02:47 said:
I also can't help but wonder what would happen to a local public employee, such as a police officer, who broke the city's sanctuary policy and reported illegal aliens to ICE. Seems to me the city might find itself in the position of having to defend a lawsuit if it punished someone for following federal law, even if violates the (illegal) local law.
Ali on Sep 03, 2008 at 13:00:52 said:
Sanctuary policies themselves are a violation of federal law, even if that law is not enforced--yet. It seems to me poor precedent for cities to deliberately refuse to assist in enforcing federal laws, particularly when it relates to criminal activities by illegal aliens. As pro-illegal-alien supporters often proclaim, it is not up to local governments to enforce immigration law. But neither is it up to them to actively thwart its enforcement with sanctuary policies.
Deport Em on Sep 03, 2008 at 11:15:16 said:
Chicago and Illinois should not be protecting illegal alien law-breakers by giving them sanctuary. All local police forces should be checking on EVERY person arrested about their immigration status or if they have been deported before. Its time for the legal citizens of Illinois to vote out the likes of Commissioner Maldonado and aldermen Ocasio and Solis since it seems they care more about the illegal Mexicans than the legal people they were elected to represent. And why we're at it, vote out Durbin and Obama (once he loses) since they are also pro-illegal. America has enough problems and we don't need our representatives working to protect and make life easier for illegal people who have no right to be in our country in the first place and turn a blind eye to the many other laws they have broken.
Dtowncondoowner on Sep 03, 2008 at 09:59:12 said:
ILLEGAL aliens complaining that our immigration laws are actually being enforced.
What's next? Bank robbers angry that our theft laws are being enforced?
Give me a break.
Dave Andres on Sep 03, 2008 at 09:57:12 said:
We need to get rid of these sanctuary laws and have full cooperation between local, state and federal law enforcement. The polce should not turn a blind eye to people who are in the country illegally.
Dave Andres on Sep 03, 2008 at 09:49:54 said:
We need to get rid of these sanctuary laws and have full cooperation between local, state and federal law enforcement. The polce should not turn a blind eye to people who are in the country illegally.
M A Andrews on Sep 02, 2008 at 10:53:23 said:
Focusing on individual Mexicans misses the big picture
that can no longer be denied ,that Mexico itself is
doing everything it can to game and abuse U.S. Law
and the 14th amendment using its 50+Mexican
consulates as beachheads in its continuing agenda
to create an Illegal Mexican Nation within the borders of the USA! 20+ million and growing "heroes" to Mexico and
"those who will think Mexico First into the 7th generation"*
*Juan Hernandez-Minister of Mexicans Abroad
MdeG on Sep 02, 2008 at 10:06:10 said:
Excuse me??? John Chivington, how would you feel if I posted "North Americans for the most part are racists?" Mexico is my second home, and your comment offends me deeply and personally. Besides which, it's untrue.
john chivington on Sep 02, 2008 at 07:54:23 said:
Mexicans for the most part are criminals. They should be used for force labor on an environmental project then deported.
-->