Families Say Detention Centers Feel Like Prison
New America Media, News Feature, Julie Johnson, Posted: Feb 27, 2007
EDITOR'S NOTE: Immigrants who end up in detention while their asylum cases move through the court find that the facilities that house them and their children are so much like prison that many asylum seekers are re-traumatized. Julie Johnson is a writer for New America Media.
Doctors told Dominica that her unborn baby was underweight and Dominica needed to eat more. But Dominica (whose name has been changed) had to spend her third trimester with her two young daughters, ages 3 and 9, at the T. Don Hutto Residential Center as they waited for their asylum case to move through the courts. She said there wasn't enough time during meals to feed her daughters and herself.
"I have to feed my children first," Dominica said, according to a report released last week about Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) facilities that house immigrant families. "They don't eat quickly."
Families report prison-like conditions at Hutto, where food is passed through a slot, only children are allowed to drink milk (despite doctors' requests for pregnant women to be allowed milk rations) and, depending on how far back you are in the cafeteria line, meal times can be as short as 10 minutes.
The report, "Locking up Family Values: The Detention of Immigrant Families," finds that the two immigration detention facilities for families in this country may be re-traumatizing families and their children, many of whom are seeking asylum from persecution in their home countries.
"These people who have committed no crime are being treated worse than we treat criminals," says Michele Brané, director of the Detention and Asylum Program for the Women's Commission for Refugee Women and Children, a New York-based nonprofit that conducted the study in collaboration with the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service (LIRS).
The report says these practices are out of step with Congress' directives on how to handle the detention of non-criminal immigrant families with children.
This year Congress reaffirmed its instruction to the U.S. Immigration Customs and Enforcement (ICE) agency to stop separating families and only use detention as a last resort. Families should be housed in "non-penal, homelike environments until the conclusion of their immigration proceedings."
But Hutto is far from a homelike environment. Instead, everybody, including children, must wear prison-issued uniforms. If not housed in the same cell, a parent can't comfort their crying child at night unless a guard gives permission. Children aren't allowed to keep the pictures they color.
Many women have reported being shackled when traveling for routine doctor appointments. According to the detention report, one woman being screened for tuberculosis told the radiologist she was five months pregnant, but the doctor refused to give her a lead screen to protect her fetus during the X-ray.
These facilities represent a major shift in U.S. policy toward families with children whose asylum or visa cases are in the immigration courts.
Until a few years ago, families apprehended for immigration violations (which are not criminal violations) were generally released with orders to appear before an immigration judge. After 9-11, ICE began detaining families, which often meant parents were detained and children were sent to shelters or foster care.
ICE can now detain up to 600 men, women and children in one of two immigration detention facilities for families.
ICE opened the first facility in 2001, the Berks Family Shelter Care Facility in Leesport, Pa. At Berks, a converted nursing home run by the county, families stay in dorm-like rooms and have greater access to recreation areas and more hours of education for children, including ESL classes.
In contrast, Hutto is a converted medium-security prison run by the Corrections Corporation of America, the largest private provider of detention and corrections services. Opened last summer, it houses up to 512 people, significantly increasing the number of families the government can detain.
Parents and children at both facilities say guards threaten to separate families as discipline for even minor child misbehavior, as they did when a 6-year-old threw a tantrum because the guards wouldn't let him keep a picture he colored, according to another detainee.
Nine-year-old Nelly told Brané she would be taken from her mother if she misbehaved, because, she said, "that's what [the guards] say."
ICE defends these family detention centers as a better option than "catch and release," which doesn't ensure families will show up for immigration court hearings. The centers, ICE says, also maintain family unity and may deter smugglers from exploiting children in the hope that if they're caught with children, they'll be released.
But many say the government's policy of who to detain and who to release is too random to justify detaining children when other options exist.
Advocates ask why these families -- many of whom are seeking asylum from persecution back home -- are detained at government expense (costing between $180-$195 per detainee per day) when less expensive and less traumatic alternatives are being used for some immigrants and criminals on parole.
"ICE portrays [their options] as either detaining families in a prison, separating them or letting them go," Brané says. "But there is a huge range of other options that both take care of government concerns and treat people humanely."
The report suggests using electric monitoring bracelets or partnering families with nonprofit groups that would oversee their case and ensure families report to immigration officers and court hearings. For those not eligible for release, it reiterates Congress' urging to house families in homelike settings.
Since the advocate groups began visiting the two facilities, ICE has made some changes. When the groups reported that shower water was scalding young children, the facilities fixed the water temperatures. They increased the hours of schooling at Hutto to match those at Berks. Photos from a press tour of Hutto last month show stuffed animals, which Brané says were noticeably absent during prior visits.
Such alternatives could have prevented a Colombian mother's three daughters - ages 7, 9 and 12 -- from spending two years in detention while their asylum case was in court appeals, according to Brané. They were eventually released, but it's too early to tell what effect their detention will have on the young girls.
Page
1 of 1
|
|

User Comments
tony ricketts on Apr 26, 2007 at 03:59:28 said:
I am an Australian citizen, my wife is US by birth.At my permanent residancy interview,USCIS adjudicators claim my wife withdrew her support for my petition.This was totally untrue and baseless.I was arrested,detained at the Broward Transitional Centre for 7 weeks and deported back to Australia, leaving my wife to struggle on her own.I never saw an immigration judge or had any right to appeal. We just had to cop it sweet.How can USCIS get away with treading on the rights of US citizens and breaking up happy and loving couples for no valid reason? They guided us through the entire process of my application, only to do this to us. So much for liberty and justice for all.
joe smith on Mar 15, 2007 at 04:56:50 said:
in regards to the user comment already posted, my opinion is this. had your husband come to this country legally in the first place, none of this would be happening to you OR your children. what you and so many others do not realize is, you husband, along with every other illegal immigrant, IS indeed a criminal. there are immigration laws for a reason, and who is your husband to simply ignore them? also, in my opinion, the government is being far nicer to your family than they should be. your husband is an illegal, and should have been deported as soon as the government found out. you, on the other hand, should have been punished for aiding an illegal alien as well. do not sit there and say that your children are crying themselves to sleep every night, because had your husband followed the correct procedures for becoming a citizen, and had you thought more carefuly about marrying an illegal, your children would not have this problem. in other words, do not blame the government for your and your husband's mistakes, blame your husband and yourself. maybe if people started taking responsibility for their actions, most of the problems in this country and worldwide would be gone.
Julie Romero on Mar 03, 2007 at 21:59:50 said:
I just read the article of facilities feeling like prisons,and that comment is so very true. I was born here in the United States but I married a immigrante we have been married for 19 years and have seven kids together, my huband's name is Fernando, he has been fighting a deportation case since 1998, he has had numerous appeals
-->along with being denied to those appeals which put him into a detention facility twice for the 90-day waiting period after that he will be sent to court in San Fransisco and we will have a choice to bail him out to await the deportion hearing or have him sit in jail longer,in the past his mother has bailed him out
Fernando is currently waiting another do-day period at the Lardo facility in Bakersfield he was once again denied on his appeal and once again we filed for a temporary stat which was granted but the Government is opposing it,just last week when I went for my visit he made the comment of the other part of the facility which holds criminals were fighting so they had the entire facility on lock down for a week, he said this isn't fair that they(others with 90-day waiting period) were treated like criminals when they are just waiting for a court date for there deportation status. I hate to see him like this he was fully employeed with health benefits for myself and kids. I don't see how the State or Government see's that by shipping them (immigrants) back were they came from helps? Helps who? not the children that are left behind or the wife. My kids are giving up on school, how can this be good for our country? they all miss their daddy and ask every day when is going to come home my four year old cries herself to sleep every single night do you think that is right? because it isn't. In my oppinion its cruelty to the loved ones that they are leaving behind when they get deported, How are the kids suppose to live a happy life without both parents raising them?